Dismissed
Smt.Mahaboobi v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/105088/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2024:KHC-D:894-DB WP No. 105088 of 2016 IN…
What the court decided
AI extract
2024:KHC-D:894-DB WP No. 105088 of 2016 IN…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:894-DB WP No. 105088 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 105088 OF 2016 (S-KAT)
BETWEEN:
SMT. MAHABOOBI I. RISALDAR, D/O. ISMAILSAB RISALDAR, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYED, R/O. THONKALSHAGALLI, INDI, DIST: BIJAPUR.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R. H. ANGADI, AND SRI. H. S. NAYAK, AND SRI. PRAKASH R. BADIGER, ADVOCATES)
AND:
CHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANI Digitally signed byCHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANIDate: 2024.01.2217:21:00 +0530
THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
RAIBAG TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-591329.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G. K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3).
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH OR ISSUE AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUNGED ORDER DATED 11.01.2016 PASSED IN APPLICATION NUMBER 7230/2013, PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, AT. BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND A DIRECTION BE ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 TO SELECT THE PETITIONER TO THE POST OF ASSISTANT TEACHER IN HINDI UNDER CATEGORY –IIB G. M. CATEGORY IN RECRUITMENT TO THE POSTS OF ASSISTANT TEACHER IN CHIKKODI EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT FOR THE YEAR 2001-2002 OR BY CREATING AN ADDITIONAL POST UNDER CATEGORY-IIB WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S G PANDIT J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This writ petition is listed for non-compliance of office
objections.
Dharwad Bench, Dharwad. The office objections are not complied and cost is not deposited.
counsel for petitioner sought pass over of the matter for compliance and for payment of costs. When the matter was called at 2.45 p.m., there is no representation for the petitioner and office objections are also not complied. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed for noncompliance of office objections as well as for non-payment of costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12
CLK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition stands for dismissal due to non-compliance of office objections and non-payment of costs.
Smt. Mahaboobi I. Risaldar
The State of Karnataka
S G Pandit
K V Aravind
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court