M/S Sri Nidhi Enterprises v. the Excise Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ appeal was dismissed due to the appellants' failure to comply with office objections despite having been granted sufficient time for the same.
This writ appeal was dismissed due to the appellants' failure to comply with office objections despite having been granted sufficient time for the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:733-DB WA No.100434 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
WRIT APPEAL NO.100434 OF 2022 (EXCISE)
BETWEEN:
M/S. SRI. NIDHI ENTERPRISES AN UNREGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, C.L. NO.2, LICENSES, HDMC STALL NO.8, MYADAR ONI, HUBLI.
Digitally K MSOMASHEKAR signed by K MSOMASHEKARDate:2024.01.17 15:30:01 +0530
(BY SRI. NARAYAN V. YAJI, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SUDHA D, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC-D:733-DB WA No.100434 of 2022
DHARWAD DISTRICT, DHARWAD 580001.
HUBLI, DHARWAD DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V.M. SHEELAVANT AND SRI. S.H. MITTALKOD, ADVOCATES FOR C/R4 to R8)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO, CALL FOR RECORDS ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER 14.06.2022 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE SINGLE JUDGE IN W. P NO.85500/2013 (EXCISE) C/W W.P. NO.80383/2013(EXCISE) AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SAID WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S G PANDIT J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC-D:733-DB WA No.100434 of 2022
ORDER
Learned counsel Sri. Narayan V.Yaji on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants prays for time to comply the office objections.
There is no justifiable reason to grant further time, since sufficient time for compliance of office objections is already granted. Till date office objections are not complied. Appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
KMS
LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 9
M/S. SRI. NIDHI ENTERPRISES
THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD DISTRICT
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE
SHARADA BAI
ANIL
S G PANDIT
K V ARAVIND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court