In thisthin oralorder, the Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution and non-compliance of office objections due to the petitioner's absence and delay in filing (pending over a year).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12635 WP No. 100239 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 100239 OF 2023 (C)
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED RIYAZ SON OF NOORULLAH, AGED 35 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BANGALORE ROAD, BALLARI.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUHAS.K.HOSAMANI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12635 WP No. 100239 of 2023
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 20.01.2023, on that day, two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed on 03.07.2024, on that day, two weeks time was granted to comply the objections raised by the registry. Despite granting time, office objections are not complied with.
The petition is listed today for orders regarding noncompliance of office objections. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is filed on 11.01.2023. Now we are in the month of September 2024. The petition is pending for almost one year eight months. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12635 WP No. 100239 of 2023
petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for
non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5
Mohammed Riyaz
The State of Karnataka
M/S. SLN Cinemas
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
