Writ petition filed for issuance of mandamus and certiorari to direct compliance of an order and quash endorsement by Respondent No.1. The petition, however, was not showing interest in being amended despite intimations given to the petitioners. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION NO. 103143 OF 2016 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARANTAKA DHARWAD BENCH
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ P. MUDHOL, ADV. FOR R1; R2-SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO COMPLY THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AS PER ANNEXURE-S AND ACCORDINGLY ISSUE SEPARATE KHATA IN RESPECT OF PETITION LANDS BEARING SURVEY NUMBER 116/5/, 116/2, 116/3, 116/4 OF MALLAPUR P.G. TALUKA GOKAK DIST: BELAGAVI OWNED BY PETITIONERS; ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED:15.07.2013, PASSED IN KRA SAM/ GRA PAM.MA PG/VI.VE/2013-14 BY RESPONDENT NO.1 ADDRESSED TO 1ST PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-V AND ENDORSEMENT DATED:15.07.2013 PASSED IN KRA SAM/GRA PAM.MA PG/VI.VE/2013-14 BY RESPONDENT NO.1 ADDRESSED TO 2ND PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-V1.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that inspite of several intimations given to the petitioners, they are not showing any interest in amending the writ petition, consequent upon, upgrading of Gram Panchayath as Town Panchayath and when the petitioners are not pursuing the matter inspite of instructions are given to them, no need to continue the same.
Hence, in view of non taking of proper steps, the writ
petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
PMP CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
2 provisions across 1 enactments
ANAND S/O. SHIDLINGAPPA GOTADAKI
SMT. MANJULA W/O. ANAND GOTADKI
GRAM PANCHAYAT MALLAPUR P.G.
TOWN PLANNING AUTHORITY, NIPANI
H.P. SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
