Petitioner sought certiorari against a Tahasildar's order dated 30.06.2018. Counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal with liberty to approach the competent authority per Bharathi Reddy v. State of Karnataka; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12553 WP No. 106575 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH WRIT PETITION NO. 106575 OF 2018 (GM-CC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. M. BHAGYAMMA W/O. CHOKKALAKSHMIPATI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: K. BELGAL VILLAGE, TQ: SHIRUGUPPA, DIST: BALLARI.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN TARIKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
GIRIJA A BYAHATTI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARANTAKA DHARWAD BENCH
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. VISHWANATH S. BICHAGATTI, ADV. FOR R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO.Kam/Chunavane/16/2016-17, DATED:30.06.2018, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 (AS PER ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
Petitioners’ counsel has filed a memo dated 02.09.2024 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority as held in the case of Bharathi Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2018) 6 SCC 162.
Memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with liberty as sought.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bharathi Reddy Vs. State of KarnatakaRelied on
(2018) 6 SCC 162 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. M. Bhagyamma
The State of Karnataka, Department of Backward Classes and Minorities Development
The Tahasildar, Siruguppa
B. Nagaraj
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
