Disposed

Smt. Chikkamma v. the Mangalore Elecricity Supply Company Limited

Karnataka HC13 Dec 2024WP/10231/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a preliminary hearing, the High Court issued a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider a representation filed on 20.10.2022 within eight weeks and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Inner applicants advised to consider the petitioners representation of 20.10.2022 within eight weeks of receipt of the certified copy of the order.

Smt. Chikkamma Vs the Mangalore Elecricity Supply… — Service and Employment | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:51466 WP No. 10231 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10231 OF 2023 (GM-KEB)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. CHIKKAMMA W/O LATE RAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDENT OF NO.190, BANUR VILLAGE, SAKARAYAPATTANA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. MOHAN.K.N., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

THE MANGALORE ELECRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, RATHNAGIRI ROAD, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER.

¶14

ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (E), MESCOM, KADUR SUB-DIVISION, DODDAPETE, KOLAR-577 548.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. H.V.DEVARAJU., ADVOCATE)

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2024:KHC:51466 WP No. 10231 of 2023

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

Sri.Mohan.K.N., counsel for the petitioner and

¶23

Sri.H.V.Devaraju., counsel for the respondents have appeared in person.

¶24

The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 20.10.2022 vide Annexure-F.

¶25

Counsel for the petitioner submits that a Mandamus may be ordered directing the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner.

¶26

Counsel for the respondents submits that if a direction is issued, the respondents would consider the representation of the petitioner.

¶27

The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record.

¶28

A Mandamus is ordered directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 20.10.2022 submitted by the

¶29

¶30

NC: 2024:KHC:51466 WP No. 10231 of 2023

¶31

petitioner vide Annexure-F, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order in accordance with the law.

¶32

Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of .

¶33

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶34

TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33

Smt. Chikkamma v. the Mangalore Elecricity Supply Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Chikkamma v. the Mangalore Elecricity Supply Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt B R Savitha Vs the Assistant Executive Engineer (Ele)

Smt N B Leelavathi Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Ramishetty Srinivasulu Vs Principal Secretary

The Executive Engineer (Elec.) Vs Sri. S. Seetharamaiah

The Executive Engineer (Elec.) Vs Sri. S. Umesha

The Divisional Controller Vs Sri.N. Narasimhamurthy