Contractors challenged a tender notification clubbing multiple works into single packages and sought directions to call tenders work-wise. The petition was dismissed as infructuous on the petitioners' counsel's submission, without adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
WRIT PETITION NO. 102253 OF 2016 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
GIRIJA A BYAHATTI
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARANTAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DHARWAD.
R/O. PLOT NO.L-29, SECTOR NO.63A NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. B.V. SOMAPUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE AN ORDER OR DIRECTION OR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATIONS VIDE ANNEXURE-A, A1 ISSUED BY THE 3RD & 4TH RESPONDENTS AT ANNEXURE-A AND A1 RESPECTIVELY IN TENDER NOTIFICATION NO.01/2015-16 DATED:31.12.2015; ISSUE AN ORDER OR A DIRECTION OR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED AT ANNEXURE-B DATED:10.12.2015 AND ANNEXURES-C, C1, C2 & C3 DATED:14.01.2016 RESPECTIVELY AND MORE PARTICULARLY TO THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED TO THE RESPONDENT NO.1 & 4 THE CHIEF PROJECT OFFICER AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS TO CALL TENDERS BY INDIVIDUAL WORK SEPARATELY INSTEAD OF CLUBBING TWO OR MORE WORKS IN A SINGLE PACKAGE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH)
Petitioners’ counsel submits that the matter has
become infructuous.
In view of the submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
NAA CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 52
N.P. Astagi
S.B. Yelavatti
V.S. Patil
M.S. Chikkappanavar
C.B. Morabad
B.V. Hiremath
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
