Dismissed

Girijawwa W/O Basappa Shirbur Alias After Marriage Girijawwa W/O Santosh Mugalkod v. the Deputy Commissioner Bagalkot

Karnataka HC29 Aug 2024WP/100320/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed in 2022 was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioners' advocate remained absent and office objections were not complied with despite repeated opportunities over nearly two years. The order decides nothing on the merits and is of no general application.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of office objections.

Girijawwa W/O Basappa Shirbur Alias After Marriage… — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:12321 WP No. 100320 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶3

DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 100320 OF 2022 (KLR-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

GIRIJAWWA D/O BASAPPA SHIRBUR @ AFTER MARRIAGE GIRIJAWWA W/O SANTOSH MUGALKOD, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: NEAR NEELAKANTHESHWAR MATH, MAHALINGAPUR, TAL: RABKAVI-BANHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶10

MAHADEVAPPA

¶11

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

S/O MALLAPPA BADARADINNI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: NEAR NEELAKANTHESHWAR MATH, BILAGI, TAL: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶13

SHANKREPPA

¶14

S/O MAHADEVAPPA BADARADINNI, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: NEAR NEELAKANTHESHWAR MATH, BILAGI, TAL: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶15

SANTOSH

¶16

S/O MAHADEVAPPA BADARDINNI, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: NEAR NEELAKANTHESHWAR MATH, BILAGI, TAL: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶17

GOURAMMA BASAVARAJ ASKI, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

¶18

2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:12321 WP No. 100320 of 2022

¶19

OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: NEAR NEELAKANTHESHWAR MATH, BILAGI, TAL: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶20

…PETITIONERS

¶21

(BY SRI. PRASHANT.S.KADADEVAR., ADVOCATE[ABSENT])

¶22

AND:

¶23

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT.

¶24

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶25

THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR, TERDAL, TAL: RABKAVI-BANHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶26

MAHADEVAPPA HOLIBASAPPA BUDIHAL, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: CHANDRAGIRI GALLI, HUNNUR, TAL: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶27

SADASHIV S/O HOLIBASAPPA BUDIHAL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: CHANDRAGIRI GALLI, HUNNUR, TAL: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶28

SMT. MINAXI W/O BASAPPA MEGADI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: CHANDRAGIRI GALLI, HUNNUR, TAL: JAMAKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT.

¶29

…RESPONDENTS

¶30

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶31

¶32

NC: 2024:KHC-D:12321 WP No. 100320 of 2022

¶33

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

When the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.

¶36

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 31.01.2022, on that day, two weeks time was granted to do the needful. Again the petition was listed on 10.07.2024, on that day, two weeks time was granted to rectify the objections raised by the registry. Despite granting time, office objections were not complied with.

¶37

The petition is listed today for orders regarding noncompliance of office objections for the third time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is filed in the year 2022. Now we are in the month of August 2024. The petition is pending for almost two years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the

¶38

¶39

NC: 2024:KHC-D:12321 WP No. 100320 of 2022

¶40

petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for

¶41

non-compliance of office objections.

¶42

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶43

MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

Girijawwa W/O Basappa Shirbur Alias After Marriage Girijawwa W/O Santosh Mugalkod v. the Deputy Commissioner Bagalkot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girijawwa W/O Basappa Shirbur Alias After Marriage Girijawwa W/O Santosh Mugalkod v. the Deputy Commissioner Bagalkot

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Jai Mata Traders Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

Sri.Rayappa Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Dilleppa Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Shankar S/O Govindappa Kulgod Vs the Land Tribunal

Shri. Ashok S/O Basappa Udarkeri Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Sumangala Kom Basappa Doddamani Vs the State of Karnataka