Writ appeal against a single judge's judgment was withdrawn after the appellant settled the matter out of court with respondent No.1. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and an interlocutory application became infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:27924-DB WA No. 3560 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI WRIT APPEAL NO. 3560 OF 2019 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE AT SAMPARKA SOUDHA NO.8, BEP PREMISES, OPPOSITE ORION MALL, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 576 010. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
…APPELLANT
(BY MS. RITHIKA MOHAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI MANU.K, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.
STATE HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, GROUND FLOOR, PWD ANNEX BUIDLING, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PAWAN KUMAR M.N, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; R-2 & R-3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE INSTANT APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 01/08/2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.5462/2018 AND DISMISSING THE SAID WRIT PETITION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, V KAMESWAR RAO J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo dated 18-07-2024 for withdrawal of the appeal by stating that appellant has settled the matter out of Court with respondent No.1.
" MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The undersigned appellant most respectfully submits that the instant matter has been settled out of court. In view of the same the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the same.
Wherefore it is prayed that the instant memo be taken on record in the interests of justice and equity."
respondent No.1, the contesting party has settled the dispute with the appellant.
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
tsn* List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Karnataka Road Development Corporation Limited
Abdul Rahiman
Government of Karnataka, Public Works, Ports & Inland Water Transport Department
Chief Engineer, State Highway Development Project
V KAMESWAR RAO
C M JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
