Smt Shantamma v. Smt Mallamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Cross-objectors in a regular second appeal failed to comply with office objections or pay costs despite time granted, and the appeal was accordingly dismissed.
Cross-objectors in a regular second appeal failed to comply with office objections or pay costs despite time granted, and the appeal was accordingly dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S KAMAL
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL. CROB NO. 17 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
W/O NANJUNDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
W/O ERANNA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF MELINAVALAGEREHALLI VILLAGE MAVINAKERE POST TURUVEKERE TALUK ... CROSS OBJECTOR/S
(By Sri./Smt : B N PUTTALINGAIAH, ADVOCATE )
AND:
W/O LATE MALLAIAH
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
…2
2
RSA.CROB NO. 17/2021
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF MELINAVALAGEREHALLI VILLAGE MAVINAKERE POST TURUVEKERE TALUK …RESPONDENT/S
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL.CROB IN RSA 547/19 FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.12.2018 PASSED IN RA.No.19/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TURUVEKERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.01.2015 PASSED IN OS No.18/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, TURUVEKERE.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order.
…3
3
RSA.CROB NO. 17/2021
ORDER
None appears for the appellants.
Despite granting sufficient time, neither the office objections are complied with nor the cost is paid. However, in the interest of justice three weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 04.04.2024, office objections
are not complied with, hence appeal stands dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By : SR R By : RG C By : PH Ty Dt : 01.06.2024 C.Dt : 03.06.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Shantamma
Smt Gangamma
Smt Mallamma
Sri Shivakumara
Sri Ningaraju
M.G.S Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court