Sriramappa v. Sri Abdul Khudus
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Second Appeal against concurrent decrees in a property suit was listed for orders. Appellant sought time to comply with office objections; two weeks were granted, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed without reference to the Bench. Office objections were not complied with and the appeal stands dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S KAMAL
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.800 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
- 1 . SRIRAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
S/O SRI MUNISHAMI
R/O AGARA VILLAGE
TEKAL HOBLI
MALUR TALUK
KOLAR DIST- 563 130
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sriramappa
- appellant
Venkataswamy (died, by legal representatives Munilakshmamma and Amaravathi)
- respondent
Abdul Khudus
- respondent
Abdul Munaff
- respondent
Abdul Rafiq
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/800/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court