The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC. The court granted time to comply with office objections, noting failure resulted in dismissal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.961 OF 2022
BETWEEN
NARASIMHAMURTHY
S/O. LATE KARIGIRIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
RESIDENT OF AJJIHALLI VILLAGE, C.N. DURGA HOBLI,
KORATAGERE TALUK. …APPELLANT/S
(Sri/Smt : K HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AND VIJAYASHRI D R ADVOCATES)
AND
1 . LAKSHMAMMA
SINCE DEAD BY LRS.,
1. DODDARAJU,
S/O. LATE NARASEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT: 46 YEARS,
2 . JAYAMMA W/O. LATE LAKSHMIKANTHA, AGED ABOUT: 41 YEARS,
...2
2
RSA NO. 961/2022
3 . NARASIMHAMURTHY @ SANNARAJU S/O. LATE NARASEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT: 44 YEARS, R1 TO R3 ARE RESIDENTS OF AJJIHALLI VILLAGE, C.N. DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
4 . THOLASAMMA W/O. CHIKKEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. DOMMAKATTE, NEAR BELAGUMBA, TUMKURU.
5 . MANJAMMA W/O. GANGADHARA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/S OF JONIGARAHALLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENT/S
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.02.2022
…3
3
RSA NO. 961/2022
PASSED IN RA.No.3/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.12.2016 PASSED IN OS No.62/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KORATAGERE.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the cost of Rs.500/- as ordered by this Court on 07.03.2024 will be made good during the course of the day. Submission is taken on record.
Finally, two weeks' time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to Bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
…4
RSA NO. 961/2022
4
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 13.08.2024, office objections
are not complied with, hence appeal shall be dismissed.
COPY
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SR(PKS) R By: RG C By: CDJ Ty Date: 28.09.2024 C Date: 30.09.2024
NARASIMHAMURTHY S/O. LATE KARIGIRIYAPPA
DODDARAJU S/O. LATE NARASEGOWDA
JAYAMMA W/O. LATE LAKSHMIKANTHA
NARASIMHAMURTHY @ SANNARAJU S/O. LATE NARASEGOWDA
THOLASAMMA W/O. CHIKKEERAPPA
MANJAMMA W/O. GANGADHARA
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
