Regular second appeal arising from a suit between the parties was dismissed as withdrawn after the appellants filed a memo recording an out-of-court settlement. Court fee refund to appellant No.1.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; refund of admissible court fee to appellant No.1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:32708 RSA No. 927 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.927 OF 2019 (MON)
BETWEEN:
BOTH APPELLANTS ARE R/AT KERETHOTA VILLAGE AGALAGANDI POST, KOPPA TALUK CHICKMAGALORE DISTRICT -577 126.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. K.N. NITISH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K V NARASIMHAN, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
M/S. BHOOPALAM S BHARATH & CO., ARECA COMMISSION AGENTS , A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM AT APMC YARD, SHIVAMOGGA BY ITS PARTNER SRI. B.N. VISHWENDRA - 577 202.
…RESPONDENT
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.10.2018 PASSED IN R.A.
NC: 2024:KHC:32708 RSA No. 927 of 2019
NO.7 OF 2015 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT SHIVAMOGGA DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.12.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.98 OF 2012 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT SHIVAMOGGA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
It is submitted by Sri. K.N. Nitish, learned counsel for the appellants that the parties to the lis have settled the matter out of court and a memo dated 12.07.2024 has been filed to that effect.
Accepting the memo dated, 12.07.2024, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn .
Registry is directed to refund the admissible court fee to the appellant No.1.
SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. B. S. Subramanya
Smt. Drakshayani
M/S. Bhoopalam S Bharath & Co., by its partner Sri. B.N. Vishwendra
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
