Second appeal under Section 100 CPC challenging concurrent decrees in a suit of 2000. Appellant failed to serve respondent despite notice and substituted service attempts; the High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:41963 RSA No. 934 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 934 OF 2013 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. KENGAL RAJE URS, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, S/O LATE KARIYAPPA RAJE URS, R/A HONGANUR VILLAGE, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. (BY SRI. KRISHNA JAISIMHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.N. SUBBA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
…APPELLANT
AND:
T. UMA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, W/O MANCHEGOWDA, R/A JANJUNATHA NILAYA, DOOR NO.LC-130/2, VIVEKANANDA EXTENTION, COLLEGE ROAD, HOSAKOTE.
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 15.2.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.66/2012 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.7.11 PASSED IN OS.NO.210/2000 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
CORAM:
ORAL JUDGMENT
Matter is of the year 2013. Notice was ordered on 14.06.2016. Sufficient opportunity was granted to take steps.
non-prosecution .
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20 CT: BHK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI. KENGAL RAJE URS
T. UMA
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
