Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a suit; appellant, appearing in person, was absent and had taken no steps for five years after notice. The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1864 OF 2014 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
DR C.T. MANJUNATH, S/O THAMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT SEETHA CLINIC, MALLANDUR ROAD, CHIKMAGALUR.
…APPELLANT
[BY DR. C.T. MANJUNATH, PARTY-IN-PERSON (ABSENT)]
AND:
K.S. YOGAPPA SHETTY, S/O HUCHHAPPA SHETTY, R/O KAMMARADI, CHAVALMANE VILLAGE, HARIHARAPURA HOBLI, KOPPA TALUK-577 126.
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT
THIS RSA FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.09.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.12/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHIKMAGALORE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.12.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.46/2006 ON THE FILE THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOPPA.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:41572 RSA No. 1864 of 2014
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Appellant/party-in-person is absent.
issuance of notice and steps have not been taken, this would indicate that appellant is not diligent in pursuing this appeal.
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr C.T. Manjunath
K.S. Yogappa Shetty
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
