H. Hanumanthappa v. Smt. Putamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal in a property dispute was listed for orders; counsel for appellants absent, one week granted to comply with office objections, failing which the appeal to be dismissed without reference to the bench.
What did the court decide?
One week granted to comply with office objections; appeal to be dismissed if not complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 923 OF 2020
BETWEEN
- H. HANUMANTHAPPA,
@ DODDAPPAIAH,
S/O LATE HULLUR HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
- H. MARAPPA @ SANNAPPAIAH,
S/O LATE HULLURU HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
H. Hanumanthappa @ Doddappaiah
- appellant
H. Marappa @ Sannappaiah
- respondent
Smt. Putamma
- respondent
Smt. Sakamma (dead by LRS)
- respondent
Obalappa
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/923/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court