Regular second appeal concerning a property dispute dismissed as not pressed after appellant filed a memo noting a registered sale deed had already been executed in his favour.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:13051 RSA No. 834 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 834 OF 2011 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SOMANATH H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K.N.CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 4.3.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.74/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., CHINTAMANI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.06.2002 PASSED IN O.S.NO.261/1994 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., SIDLAGHATTA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for dismissal of the appeal. In the memo, it is stated that already executed registered sale deed in favour of the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as notpressed.
Sd/JUDGE
RHS
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Venkateshappa s/o Subbaiah
Smt. Muniyamma w/o Lakshmanna
H.P.Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
