Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Smt Shivamma Vs K.C.Gajendra — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2024)

Home
Karnataka HC
2024
Smt Shivamma Vs K.C.GajendraSmt Shivamma v. K.C.Gajendra

Dismissed

Smt Shivamma v. K.C.Gajendra

Karnataka HC29 Oct 2024RSA/819/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A regular second appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the appellants and their counsel.

What did the court decide?

Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:43629 RSA No. 819 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 819 OF 2020 (SP)

BETWEEN:

SMT.SHIVAMMA W/O LATE KAPANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

SMT. HEMAVATHI D/O LATE KAPANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

APPELLANTS NO.1 AND 2 R/AT SREERAMANAGARA, BHADRAVATHI TALUK-577 301.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. VINOD.M & SRI. RAVIKIRAN.C., ADVOCATES [ABSENT])

AND:

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908100

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
SMT.SHIVAMMA W/O LATE KAPANAIAH
appellant
SMT. HEMAVATHI D/O LATE KAPANAIAH
respondent
K.C.GAJENDRA S/O LATE K.A.CHANGAPPA

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 29 Oct 2024 · October
Registered: 10 Jul 2020
Case no.: RSA/819/2020

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Jyoti M

Sri G Thimmanna Vs Sri P K Indresh Reddy
23 Oct 2024
Shri Badarinath S Patil Vs Union of India
26 Sept 2024
Shri. Yallappa S/O Chandrappa Kallammanavar Vs Smt. Iravva W/O Bhimarayappa Irappanavar
5 Sept 2024
Gurumallu Vs H K Kalaiah Dead by Lrs
30 Oct 2024

Cite this judgement

Smt Shivamma v. K.C.Gajendra, RSA/819/2020 (KA), decided on 29 October 2024.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908100

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

JYOTI MULIMANI

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka

K.C.GAJENDRA S/O LATE K.A.CHANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT SREERAMANAGARA, BHADRAVATHI TALUK-577 301.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. SANJEEV.B.L., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

2 -

NC: 2024:KHC:43629 RSA No. 819 of 2020

ORAL ORDER

When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 28.10.2024, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 29.10.2024.

The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution .

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 97

JYOTI MULIMANI

CNR

KAHC010061202020

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

Sri S M Manjunatha Vs Sri S M Subramanya

30 Oct 2024

Bharath Earth Movers Vs Sri T G Ravi

4 Nov 2024