Indiramma v. Gundappa
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after six years of pendency as appellants were absent and made no representation. Counsel for respondent appeared alone.
What did the court decide?
Regular Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:51660 RSA No. 609 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 609 OF 2018 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
- INDIRAMMA
W/O. LATE VENKATAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O UNTOORKATTE - KAIMARA, HOSALLI VILLAGE, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK - 577 432, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
- KALPANA W/O. SATHYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O HALEMANE, BASAVANI POST, BANDIGAD VILLAGE, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK - 577 432, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT.
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Indiramma
- appellant
Kalpana
- respondent
Gundappa
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/609/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court