Court ordered two weeks time to remove office objections in Regular Second Appeal No. 437 of 2024. Subsequent order held that failure to comply led to dismissal of appeal.
Dismissal of the Regular Second Appeal due to failure to remove office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024 BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 437 OF 2024
BETWEEN
SRI MARAPPA
SON OF LATE HANUMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RESIDING AT GOPALAPURA VILLAGE,
DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-562123
...APPELLANT/S
(By Sri./Smt :P M SIDDAMALLAPPA AND P M GOPI, ADVOCATES)
AND
WIFE OF LAKKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
RESIDING AT GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-562123
WIFE OF GALI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA,
…2
2
RSA NO. 437/2024
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-562123
…3
3
RSA NO. 437/2024
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
RESIDING AT GOPALAPURA VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-562123
7 . SMT VIJAYAMMA DAUGHTER OF GALI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT LAKSHMIPURA VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI,
BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-562123 …RESPONDENT/S
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF
CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 4.01.2024 PASSED IN RA NO.12/2016 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.12.2015 PASSED IN OS NO.86/1999 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
…4
RSA NO. 437/2024
4
ORAL ORDER
Finally, two weeks time is granted to remove the office objections, failing which the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 21.09.2024, office objections
are not complied with, hence appeal dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SR R By: VS C By: RG
Ty Date: 05.12.2024 C Date: 05.12.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to failure to comply with the order to remove office objections within two weeks?
Sri Marappa
Smt. ThimmaHANUMAKKA
Smt. Lakshmamma
Sri Venugopal
Sri Srinivasa
Sri Hanumesh
E. S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
