Review petition against the order in WP No.11/2022 challenging a survey sketch dated 24.02.2020. The court held the petitioner's remedy was to approach the competent authority and, relying on Supreme Court precedent, dismissed the review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:38787 RP No. 608 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 608 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.11 OF 2022 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. DODDABILIGOWDA MEMORIABLE CHARITABLE TRUST (REGD) HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.722, DR.MODI ROAD WEST OF CHORD ROAD, II STAGE BENGALURU-560 086 REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SRI. B. SACHIDANANDA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GOVIDARAYA KAMATH K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2024:KHC:38787 RP No. 608 of 2023
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHRAY LAGALI, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 OF CPC, R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 PRAYING TO GRANT THE FOLLOWING RELIEF/(S) IN THE INTEREST OF EQUITY AND JUSTICE AND ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION SEEKING REVIEW OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 22/11/2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP NO.11/2022, AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
This review petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 22.11.2023 in Writ Petition No.11/2022.
"a. xxxx.
NC: 2024:KHC:38787 RP No. 608 of 2023
b. Quash the impugned Survey sketch dated 24.02.2020 produced at Annexures P to Q.
c.xxxxx
d.xxxxx"
24.02.2020 at Annexures P to Q to the writ petition. In that view of the matter, remedy available for the petitioner is to approach the competent authority. In that view of the matter and in view of declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs. State Tax Officer
(I) and another1 , I do not find any acceptable grounds to review the order dated 22.11.2023 in WP No.11/2022.
SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
Sk/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27
1 (2024) 2 SCC 362
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there are grounds to review the order dated 22.11.2023 in WP No.11/2022 challenging a survey sketch.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sanjay Kumar Agarwal vs. State Tax Officer (I) and anotherRelied on
(2024) 2 SCC 362 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Doddabiligowda Memorable Charitable Trust (Regd), rep. by its Managing Trustee Sri B. Sachidananda
State of Karnataka, rep. by its Chief Secretary
The Assistant Director of Land Records
The Tahsildar, Maddur Taluk
Sri Sri Sri Yambargiar Mahatmara Vrundavanasthra Mathada Seva Sangha, rep. by its Secretary
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
