Dismissed
S M Raju v. G L Dinesh
Karnataka HCRSA/377/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Regular second appeal against confirmation of an execution case order was dismissed for non-prosecution after the appellant's counsel repeatedly failed to appear despite multiple opportunities granted over several listings.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
NC: 2024:KHC:24395 RSA No. 377 of 2020
¶2
- 1 -
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶4
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2024
¶5
BEFORE
¶6
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
¶7
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 377 OF 2020 (PAR)
¶8
BETWEEN:
¶9
- S.M.RAJU AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE MALLAPPA, RESIDENT OF SHATIGRAMA VILLAGE, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573220.
¶10
…APPELLANT
¶11
(BY SRI. BASAVEGOWDA D.J., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
¶12
AND:
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
S.M.Raju
- respondent
G.L.Dinesh
- respondent
Shantamma
- respondent
Mayadevi
- respondent
Nandisha
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/377/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court