Regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC against concurrent decrees in a suit for declaration and injunction. Counsel filed a memo stating the matter was settled between the parties; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 190 OF 2021 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MRS. CHIKKALINGAMMA, W/O LATE H. MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT VANDARAGUPPE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 160.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VICTOR MANOHARAN S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. CHIKKAMADAIAH, S/O LATE MADAHEGGADE, R/AT VANDARAGUPPE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 160.
…RESPONDENT
THIS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.11.2020 PASSED IN RA.No.48/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.09.2018
NC: 2024:KHC:24542 RSA No. 190 of 2021
PASSED IN OS.No.119/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNAPATNA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Counsel for the appellant has filed a memo stating
that the matter is settled between the parties. Hence, permitted to withdraw and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs. Chikkalingamma
Mr. Chikkamadaiah
H.P.Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
