Second appeal arising from a suit for declaration and injunction concerning village property. Appellants filed a memo stating legal representatives did not intend to pursue the appeal; the High Court took the memo on record and dismissed the appeal as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2902 OF 2010 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka
2(a) TO 2(d) ARE R/O CHOKKANDAHALLY VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT 563 101.
KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT 563 101.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI M. NARAYANA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
PROPOSED LRs OF 1ST RESPONDENT 1(a) -1(g) ARE R/A CHOKKANDAHALLY VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
KOLAR DISTRICT 563 101.
APPELLANTS 3 TO 7 ARE R/AT KUPPASETTY BAVI BEEDI, MALUR TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT 563 101.
…RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI B.K. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV. FOR R1 & R1(b) (NOC); R1(c-g),R2, R4, R8, R9, R11, R13, R14 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED; V/O/D 08.10.2015, NOTICE TO R5 TO R7 ARE H/S; V/O/D 08.10.2015, R4 TO R7 ARE TREATED AS LRs OF DECEASED R3; V/O/D 09.07.2024, R1(b-g) ARE TREATED AS LRs OF DECEASED R1(a)]
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.8.2010 PASSED IN R.A.NO.16/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) KOLAR ITINERATING AT MALUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.11.2004 PASSED IN O.S.NO.63/1993 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) MALUR.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR HEARING ON I.A., THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellants has filed a memo stating that legal representatives of original parties do not intend to pursue appeal.
not pressed.
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Basavaraju
C.M. Basappa
K.C. Balaji Singh
The Deity Durga Ganapathy
Munipoojappa
Muninanjappa
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
