Second appeal in a decree for declaration and injunction was dismissed as infructuous after counsel reported that the parties had settled the matter in Ex.no.50/2017 before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:53049 RSA No. 1036 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1036 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MUTTHU @ MUTTANA S/O G GOVINDAPPA AGED 73 YEARS, R/O BHOVI COLONY, SUBASHNAGAR, VIDYANAGAR EXTENSION, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201.
…APPELLANT
[BY SRI P.N. HARISH, ADVOCATE (PH)]
AND:
KAMALAMMA, W/O H R KUBERACHAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O OPP TO BRAHMINS HOSTEL, B.H.ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201.
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT
[BY SRI K.V. SATISH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 10.11.2016 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 40/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM., SHIVAMOGGA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.01.2014 PASSED IN OS.NO.201/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC., SHIVAMOGGA.
NC: 2024:KHC:53049 RSA No. 1036 of 2017
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION , THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant submits that on verification, it is found that parties have settled matter in Ex.no.50/2017 before I Additional Civil Judge, Shivamogga.
Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mutthu @ Muttana S/o G Govindappa
Kamalamma W/o H R Kuberachar
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
