Appellants filed a regular second appeal against concurrent adverse decrees in a property suit; before final hearing they submitted a notarised memo stating the parties had settled the matter out of court, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2079 OF 2008 (RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NEAR RIVER SIDE IN BELTHANGADY, KASBA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, POST: BELTHANGADY, D.K. – 574 214.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
ALL ARE RESIDINGA AT CHIBIDRA VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.
(AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 12.01.2018)
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 1.8.2008 PASSED IN R.A.NO.47/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, (SR.DN), & JMFC, PUTTUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 8.10.2001 PASSED IN O.S.NO.128/1991 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, (JR.DN), & JMFC, BELTHANGADI.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the parties have settled the matter outside the Court. The memo is attested by the notary at Belthangady, Dakshina Kannada.
NC: 2024:KHC:10143 RSA No. 2079 of 2008
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
MD
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sudarshana
Ms. Jayalakshmi
Ms. Deekshitha
N. Vasantha Madhava Hebbar (dead) by his LRs
H.P.Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
