An appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC was dismissed after the appellants obtained permission to withdraw the appeal citing the sale of the suit schedule property.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.152 OF 2009 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
MITHABAGILU VILLAGE PO KILLUR, BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI NATARAJA BALLAL, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SHARANYA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:9803 RSA No. 152 of 2009
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SACHIN B S, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI VENKATASATYA NARAYANA, THE HCGP FOR R3 & R4)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 01.10.2008 PASSED IN R.A.NO.8/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) & JMFC, PUTTUR, D.K. AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal on the ground that they have sold the suit schedule property under a registered sale deed, therefore, they does not intend to pursue the appeal. In view of the said memo, the appellants are permitted to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SN
GUTTU RAYAPPA @ NAGAPPA SHETTY
PADMARAJA SHETTY
MRS RATHNAVATHI
MRS DHARAMMA
THE TAHSILDAR BELTHANGADY
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D.K DISTRICT
H.P.SANDESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
