K S Ramesh v. K T Chandrashekar
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular second appeal in a partition suit was withdrawn by the appellants' counsel through a memo seeking permission to withdraw; the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Regular second appeal in a partition suit was withdrawn by the appellants' counsel through a memo seeking permission to withdraw; the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 184 OF 2012 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF
KESAGODU VILLAGE BICCODU HOBLI BELUR TALUK-573 215
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI A RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE ABOVE RESPONDENTS ARE RESIDENTS OF KESAGODU VILLAGE BICCODU HOBLI
NC: 2024:KHC:22799 RSA No. 184 of 2012
BELUR TALUK-573 215
S/O BASAVEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS COFFEE AND RICE MERCHANT J P NAGAR, BALLUPET-573 214 SAKALESHPUR TALUK
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.J.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI K.GURUDHATTA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; R4, R5, R7, R9 ARE SERVED;
VIDE ORDER DATED 06.03.2019 APPEAL IS ABATED IN RESPECT OF DECEASED R8)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.9.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.16/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BELUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 9.4.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.442/1995 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., BELUR.
THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed Memo. Memo
reads as under:
“The undersigned prays that the Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the appellants to withdraw the above case, in the ends of equity and justice.”
NC: 2024:KHC:22799 RSA No. 184 of 2012
In view of the memo second appeal is dismissed as with
drawn .
Sd/JUDGE
MR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 17
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K S Ramesh
K S Umesh
K T Chandrashekar
K T Renukesha
K T Nataraja
Rajamma
V Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court