Mahaboob v. Ravikumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 NI Act was dismissed for non-prosecution as office objections were not complied with and no representation appeared for the petitioner.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:22293 CRL.RP No. 262 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 262 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
MAHABOOB S/O KASIM SAB, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT BEGIRIVATARA, INDIRANAGARA, TURUVEKERE TOWN - 572 227, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SRINIVASA M.G, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
RAVIKUMAR, S/O MUDLAGIRAIAH, Digitally AGED 51 YEARS, signed by V KRISHNA R/AT KEREBEEDHI, Location: High TURUVEKERE TOWN -572 227, Court of TUMKUR DISTRICT. Karnataka
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mahaboob S/o Kasim Sab
- respondent
Ravikumar S/o Mudlagiraiah
Coram
V Srishananda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.RP/262/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court