Regular second appeal under Section 100 CPC challenging concurrent decrees in a suit against the Government and Tahsildar. Listed for compliance of office objections; no representation or compliance. Two weeks' final time granted, failing which the appeal stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S KAMAL
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 160 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
1. SIDDEGOWDA @ HALAVEGOWDA
AGED 85 YEARS R/AT BANNAHALLI VILLAGE ARAKERE HOBLI SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571436
REPRESENTED BY G.P.A HOLDER SON
PUTTASWAMY
AGED 51 YEARS
R/O BENNANAHALLI VILLAGE
ARAKERE HOBLI SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT ...APPELLANT/S
(By Sri/Smt. : PRAMOD R AND RAGHU R, ADVOCATES)
…2
2
RSA NO. 160/2019
AND:
MANDYA DISTRICT-571436
2 . TAHSILDAR SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, SRIRANGAPATNA-571428 …RESPONDENT/S
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.09.2018 PASSED IN RA.NO.5007/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA (SITTING AT SRIRANGAPTNA), DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.12.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.42/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SRIRANGAPATNA.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order.
ORDER
This matter was listed on 4.1.2024 for compliance of office objections. Since none appeared on the said date, a weeks’ time
…3
3
RSA NO. 160/2019
was granted for compliance of office objections subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- making it clear that if office objections are not complied, the appeal would result in dismissal. Hence, the matter is listed today for orders.
Today there is no representation. Neither the office objections are complied with nor the cost is paid. In the interest of justice, two weeks’ time granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.
Sd/JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 23.04.2024, office objections
are not complied with, hence appeal shall stand dismissed.
COPY
Sd/I/c ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By : SR R By : RG C By : VS Ty Dt : 29.07.2024 C.Dt : 02.08.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Siddegowda @ Halavegowda (represented by G.P.A. holder Puttaswamy)
Government of Karnataka, represented by District Commissioner, Mandya District
Tahsildar Srirangapatna Taluk
M.G.S. Kamal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
