Siddamma v. Gowramma
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and non-payment of costs.
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and non-payment of costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S KAMAL
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1431 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
W/O LATE VENKATARAVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS
S/O LATE VENKATARAVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
S/O LATE VENKATARAVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
4 . SMT. PADMA W/O SEENAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 6 R/AT INAMINCHENAHALLI VILLAGE
…2
2
RSA NO. 1431/2021
KASAB AHOBLI
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101 ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri/Smt. : RAMESH R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT INAMINCHENAHALLI VILLAGE
KASABA HOBLI
CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK
AND DISTRICT-562101
D/O LATE VENKATARVANAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT INAMINCHENAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101
3 . SRI R SATHYANARAYANARAJU S/O LATE RAMASUBBARAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO.65, 2ND FLOOR BRINDAVAN SANJEEVNAGAR SAHAKARNAGAR POST BENGALURU-560092 …RESPONDENT/S …3
3
RSA NO. 1431/2021
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.09.2020 PASSED IN RA.No.78/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHICKBALLAPURA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.04.2018 PASSED IN OS No.104/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHICKBALLAPURA.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order.
ORDER
This matter was listed on 11.1.2024 for compliance of office objections. Since none appeared on the said date, two weeks’ time was granted for compliance of office objections subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- making it clear that if office objections are not complied, the appeal would result in dismissal. Hence, the matter is listed today for orders.
Even today there is no representation. Neither the office objections are complied with nor the cost is paid. In the interest
…4
RSA NO. 1431/2021
4
of justice, two weeks’ time granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.
Sd/JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 23.04.2024, office objections
are not complied with, hence appeal stand dismissed.
COPY
Sd/I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By : SR R By : RG C By : CMS Ty Dt : 19.07.2024 C.Dt : 19.07.2024
SMT. SIDDAMMA
SRI VENKATESHAPPA
SRI SEENAPPA
SMT. PADMA
SMT. GOWRAMMA
SMT. SUBAMMA
M.G.S KAMAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court