Regular second appeal against concurrent decrees in a property suit was listed for non-compliance of office objections; time granted to remove objections, failing which appeal to stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1560 OF 2021
BETWEEN
RANGEGOWDA
SINCE DEAD BY LRS
1. CHAYAMANI
W/O RAJU
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/O. ETHINAKATTE VILLAGE, ALUR TALUK,
2. ANANTHALAKSHMI
W/O DEVARAJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/O. BYRAPURA VILLAGE
ALUR TALUK.
D/O LATE RANGEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/O. BYRAPURA VILLAGE, ALUR TALUK,
….2.
2
RSA NO. 1560/2021
4. SHARADA
D/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/O. HULIKAL VILLAGE HASSAN TALUK
5. ANANDA
S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O BYRAPURA VILLAGE ALUR TALUK.
D/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/O. BYRAPURA VILLAGE, ALUR TALUK,.
7. THIMMEGOWDA @ KUMARA S/O LATE SAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
…3
3
RSA NO. 1560/2021
S/O LATE THIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
AND
W/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/O HOSUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ALUR TALUK. .….RESPONDENT/S
….4
RSA NO. 1560/2021
4
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.06.2019 PASSED IN RA.NO.55/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.04.2017 PASSED IN OS No.51/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HASSAN.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
ORAL ORDER
As the matter is listed for the fourth time for noncompliance of office objections, finally, two weeks' time is granted for removing office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
….5
5 RSA NO. 1560/2021
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 09.08.2024, office objections are not complied with, hence appeal stands dismissed.
COPY
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SR(PKS) R By: RG C By: CDJ Ty Date: 11.09.2024 C Date: 11.09.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chayamani
Ananthalakshmi
Veena
Sharada
Ananda
Rukmini
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
