Yankappa v. Honnappa
Case brief
What is this about?
Two joint second appeals filed under Section 100 CPC regarding the execution and succession to property were dismissed for non-prosecution as the counsel for appellants appeared without their present instructions.
What did the court decide?
Both the regular second appeals are dismissed for non-pursuance of the matter by the appellants.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2024:KHC:21176 RSA No. 1540 of 2018 C/W RSA No. 1539 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1540 OF 2018 (PAR) C/W REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1539 OF 2018 (PAR)
IN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1540 OF 2018:
BETWEEN:
- YANKAPPA
S/O. YALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST, R/O. LOKIKERE VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK-577 001.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Yankappa and others
- respondent
Honnappa and others
Coram
H.P. Sandesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/1540/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court