Regular second appeal against a first appellate decree in a property suit. Listed five times for non-compliance with office objections; counsel absent and failed to pay costs, so the appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2024 BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1492 OF 2021
BETWEEN
SRI D. NARASIMHALU NAIDU ALIAS D. N. NAIDU, S/O LATE DORESWAMY NAIDU, SINCE DEAD BY LRS.,
W/O LATE D. NARASIMHALU NAIDU
@ D. N. NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.260, 36TH CORSS, VIII BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 082.
D/O LATE D. NARASIMHALU NAIDU @ D. N. NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, NO.34/94 V MAIN ROAD, V BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 082.
…2
2
RSA NO.1492/2021
3 . SMT. GEETHA PARAMAHAMSA, D/O LATE D. NARASIMHALU NAIDU @ D. N. NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NO.56, 40TH CROSS, VIII BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 082.
5 . SRI DINESH BABU, S/O LATE D. NARASIMHALU NAIDU @ D. N. NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
6 . SRI ANAND BABU, S/O LATE D. NARASIMHALU NAIDU, @ D. N. NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, APPELLANT NOS. 4, 5 AND 6 ARE R/AT NO.260, 36TH CROSS, VIII BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 082. ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri/Smt : D. RAGHU PRAKASH BABU, D. LAKSHMAN AND SNEHA M. P., ADVOCATES ) …3
3
RSA NO.1492/2021
AND
S/O LATE KYATHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
S/O MARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
S/O MARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 6 ARE TOGETHER RESIDING AT BANDIKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI,
BANGALORE NORTH TALUK – 562 149. …RESPONDENT/S
…4
RSA NO.1492/2021
4
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.07.2020 PASSED IN R.A.NO.15013/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.11.2017 PASSED IN O.S. NO. 115/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
ORDER
The learned counsel for the appellants is absent.
This matter is listed 5th time for non-compliance of office objections, but no representation. Hence, on cost of Rs.1,000/payable at the Registry, two weeks time is granted. If the counsel does not pay the cost and fails to comply with the office objections, appeal will be dismissed without reference to bench.
Sd/-
JUDGE
…5
RSA NO.1492/2021
5
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 11.07.2024, counsel failed to pay the cost and the office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SR R By: VS C By: GS Ty Date: 31.10.2025 C Date: 04.11.2025
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri D. Narasimhalu Naidu alias D.N. Naidu (dead) by LRs - Lakshmi, Padmavathi, Geetha Paramahamsa, Dr. Shobha Naidu, Dinesh Babu, Anand Babu
K. Marappa
Pillamma
Prakash
Murthy
Ramesh
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
