Regular second appeal against a concurrent decree in a property suit was dismissed because the appellants' counsel failed to comply with office objections despite being granted time on payment of further cost.
None; appeal dismissed for non-compliance with office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY 2024
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1041 OF 2020
BETWEEN
S. K. GURURAJA (PLAINTIFF),
DEAD BY LRS.,
D/O LATE S. K. GURURAJ,
AGE: 14 YEARS,
(11 YEARS WHEN BROUGHT ON RECORD IN THE TRIAL COURT IN THE YEAR 2017),
BY NEXT FRIEND AND GRAND FATHER: S. M. KUMAR, S/O MALLANNA,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST,
R/O ASHOK ROAD, SAGAR TOWN,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 401.
S/O VEERABHADRAPPA GOWDA,
AGE:38 YEARS,
(35 YEARS WHEN BROUGHT ON RECORD IN THE TRIAL COURT IN THE YEAR 2017),
…2
2
RSA NO.1041/2020
AGRICULTURIST, R/O VEERAPURA, NOW R/O ANALEKOPPA EXTENSION, SAGAR TOWN, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 401.
BY GPA HOLDER S. M. KUMAR, S/O MALLANNA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURISTS, R/O ASHOK ROAD, SAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 401. ...APPELLANT/S
(By Sri/Smt. : MAHESH R. UPPIN AND RAJATH S., ADVOCATES )
AND
RAVIKUMAR, S/O KRISHNAMURTHY RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURISTS AND BUSINESS MAN IN TEA POWDER, S. N. NAGAR, SAGAR TOWN, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT – 577 401. …RESPONDENT/S
…3
3
RSA NO.1041/2020
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.12.2019 PASSED IN RA.NO.10012/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA (SITTING AT SAGAR), DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.12.2018 PASSED IN OS.NO.6/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAGAR.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
ORDER
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has paid the cost, but not comply with the office objections and seeks time to comply with the office objections. Hence, on further cost of Rs.500/- payable at the Registry another two weeks time is granted. If the counsel does not pay further cost and fails to comply with the office objection, appeal will be dismissed without reference to bench.
Sd/- JUDGE
…4
RSA NO.1041/2020
4
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 11.07.2024, the office objections are not complied with, hence the appeal is hereby
dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: SR R By: VS C By: GS Ty Date: 31.10.2025 C Date: 04.11.2025
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kumari Pooja
H.V. Shivaprakash @ Prakash
Ravikumar
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
