Regular second appeal in a partition matter was dismissed because the appellant failed to pay the imposed cost of Rs.1,000 and to comply with office objections despite an earlier opportunity granted by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1143 OF 2019 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI M.NARAYANAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.03.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.84/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.04.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.561/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MALUR.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
This Court vide order dated 29.01.2024, granted two weeks time to comply with the office objections subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to the Advocates Association Bangalore Library Fund, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed. Inspite of it, the cost is not paid and the office objections are also not complied with.
payment of cost and non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
MD
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Jayalakshmamma
Smt. Narayanamma
Sri. B.Muniraju
Sri. Krishnappa
Sri. Venkataramanappa
Sri. Gopalappa
H.P.Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
