Suresha v. Chandramma
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of representation by either party over multiple hearings.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:13325 RPFC No. 173 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 173 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SURESHA S/O ANANDAIAH, RESIDING AT MAVUKERE VILLAGE, KORA HOBLI, TUMKUR TATLUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT, PIN 572116.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH K.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
- CHANDRAMMA W/O SURESHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SURESHA S/O ANANDAIAH
- respondent
CHANDRAMMA W/O SURESHA
- respondent
VARSHITHA D/O SURESHA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- RPFC/173/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court