Revision petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act challenging a maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive dates despite listing under 'dismissal' caption.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:39083 RPFC No. 139 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 139 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. B. PARASHURAMA, S/O B. BHUJANGAIAHA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT VIVEK NAGARA BUS STOP BACKSIDE, HESARUGATTA MAIN ROAD, HESARUGATTA, BANGALORE - 560 073.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VARUN KUMAR K.R, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. KAMALAMMA, W/O B. PARASHURAMA, D/O RANGAIAHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT RAMACHANDRA EXTENSION, WARD NO. 27, AMBEDKAR VEEDI, CHAMARAJANAGARA - 571 313.
…RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.04.2024 PASSED IN C.MISC NO.203/2018 ON THE FILE OF RPL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHAMARAJANAGARA., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE.
NC: 2024:KHC:39083 RPFC No. 139 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
In this matter, the office has raised issue of
maintainability of this petition. When the matter came up before this Court on 20.09.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' for today. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri. B. Parashurama
Smt. Kamalamma
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
