Sri Ramesh v. Gowramma
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the Trial Court failed to consider the husband's income and age evidence when granting interim maintenance. The Court set aside the order and allowed the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
The order passed in I.A.No.2 dated 15.11.2023 is set aside and the Writ Petition is allowed.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:39133 WP No. 15978 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 15978 OF 2024 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAMESH, S/O. LATE CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. KORA VILLAGE, KORA HOBLI, TUMAKURU TALUK, NOW R/AT N. RAMPURA GATE, NITTUR HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572223.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAMESH K.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Trial Court's order granting interim maintenance to the wife requires interference in a writ petition under Article 227.
Whether sufficient evidence was placed on record to justify the award of maintenance given the husband's age and lack of proven income.
Whether the order is reasoned and reasonable considering the parties' claim of living separately.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SRI. RAMESH, S/O. LATE CHANDRAIAH
- respondent
GOWRAMMA, W/O. RAMESH
Coram
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/15978/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court