Revision petition against a Family Court order partly allowing a maintenance claim under Section 125 Cr.P.C., filed in 2020. The petitioner repeatedly failed to appear and comply with office objections despite restoration after an earlier dismissal; the High Court dismissed the revision petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:38349 RPFC No. 122 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.122 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SRI. S M KARTHIK S/O S MANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT HOSAKERE SOKKE HOBLI, JAGALURU TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT PIN-577528
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SURESHA M G, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SMT. CHANDHANA T N W/O S M KARTHIK D/O NARASIMHAMURTHY T P AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.246, MUNICIPAL LAYOUT PAKEERAPPANAPALYA TUMAKURU TOWN TUMAKURU – 572 101
…RESPONDENT
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT 1984 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22.01.2020 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.201/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, AT TUMAKURU PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF CR.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE.
NC: 2024:KHC:38349 RPFC No. 122 of 2020
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
This is an RPFC of the year 2020. Earlier, in view of the peremptory order dated 30.03.2021, the revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution on 08.09.2021. Thereafter, an application was filed to recall the order dated 08.09.2021, then this Court had allowed the application and the order was recalled. One week time was granted to comply with the office objections. On 13.06.2024, this Court had directed the matter to be listed after compliance of office objections.
NC: 2024:KHC:38349 RPFC No. 122 of 2020
that view of the matter, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
prosecution .
SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 3 Sl No.: 4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri. S M Karthik
Smt. Chandhana T N
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
