Appeal against rejection of a temporary injunction application; only an order granting one week to comply with office objections was passed, with dismissal in default. The objections were not complied with and the appeal stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8515 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
SHARADHA C. D/O CHIKKA KALAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.9, 8TH CROSS VENKATAPURA GRAMA, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU.
..APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SYED UMMER, ISMAIL ZABIULLA, ADVOCATES)
AND:
MARUTHISH S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING NEAR VIJAYLAKSHMI LAUNDARY 6TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN, VENKATAPURA GRAMA KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU.
..RESPONDENT
2
MFA.No.8515/2023
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/O 43 Rule 1(r) of the CPC, against the Order dated 25.11.2023 passed on IA No.1 in O.S. No.6701/2023 on the file of the XLI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, rejecting IA No.1 filed U/O 39 rules 1 and 2 R/W Sec. 151 of CPC, 1908.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER
One week time is granted to comply with the office objections.
By that time, if the office objections are not complied with, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Sd/JUDGE
NOTE: Court Order dt.18.09.2024, not complied with. Hence, Appeal stands dismissed.
COPY
Sd/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
T By: AR R By: YL C By: VL
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sharadha C.
Maruthish
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
