Appeal by unsuccessful plaintiff in a money recovery suit dismissed for non-prosecution as service was incomplete and no one appeared for the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:35876 RFA No. 127 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No. 127 OF 2016 (MON)
BETWEEN:
PUY VAST MARITIME INDIA PVT. LTD., NO.6, HARRIS ROAD, BENSON TOWN, BANGALORE-560 046. REPRESENTED BY ITS G.P.A. HOLDER SRI. THIRUMURTHI, S/O D. KALIAPPAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.ISMAIL M. MUSBA, ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.03.2015 PASSED IN OS NO.47/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH 18), DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
NC: 2024:KHC:35876 RFA No. 127 of 2016
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the appellant.
Appeal is of the year 2016. Till today service is not complete for not taking appropriate steps. Decree is a money decree and appeal is filed by the unsuccessful plaintiff.
Taking note of these aspects of the matter, appeal stands
dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Puy Vast Maritime India Pvt. Ltd.
Sri. Rama Enterprises
R.L. Subramanya Swamy
V Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
