The court observed an objection regarding maintainability due to pecuniary jurisdiction not exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs. On the appellant's counsel seeking return of the memo, the court directed its return with liberty to file before the District Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:50121 RFA No. 2501 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2501 OF 2024 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI N SRINIVASA S/O P. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT GADDEKANNUR VILLAGE TAMAKA POST, KASABA HOBLI KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101 …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAJESH GOWDA.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.03.2024. PASSED IN OS NO.168/2021 ON THE FILE OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KOLAR, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
ORAL JUDGMENT
Office raised an objection regarding maintainability
of the appeal as the pecuniary jurisdiction is not exceeding
Rs.10 lakhs.
for return of the appeal memo with liberty to file the same
before the District Court.
of.
Sd/(K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE
CM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable given the pecuniary jurisdiction limit?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri N Srinivasa
Smt Manjula
Sri Venkateshappa
Smt. SHANTHAMMA
Sri. Krishna Murthy
K.Natarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
