Appeal against dismissal of a suit for permanent injunction against BDA. Counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal; the High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn without deciding the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1937 OF 2024 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MURGESH S/O LATE MANIKYAM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.110, JALABHAVANA ROAD, NEAR FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, NEAREST NAL LAYOUT, 4TH 'T' BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. GOVINDARAJU S.P., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed 1. THE COMMISSIONER, by MAMATHA BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, R BENGALURU. Location: High Court of Karnataka 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 19.06.2024 PASSED IN OS NO. 7829/2017 ON THE FILE OF XXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU., DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/(K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE
VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18 CT:SNN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Murgesh S/o Late Manikyam
The Commissioner, Bengaluru Development Authority
The Executive Engineer, Banashankari BDA Complex, Bengaluru
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Banashankari BDA Complex, Bengaluru
K.Natarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
