M/S. Camson Bio Technologies Ltd. v. M/S. Dtdc Courier & Cargo Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against money-recovery decree; dismissed for appellants' failure to file paper books despite sufficient opportunity.
Appeal against money-recovery decree; dismissed for appellants' failure to file paper books despite sufficient opportunity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:32811-DB RFA No. 222 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 222 OF 2015 (MON)
BETWEEN:
AT PRESENT C-7, 7TH FLOOR, CORPORATE BLOCK, GOLDEN ENCLAVE, OLD AIRPORT ROAD, BENGALURU-560 017.
Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRI. VIJAYENDRA. P AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O G.S. PALAKSHA MURTHY.
SRI. VIJAYENDRA P AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O G.S. PALAKSHA MURTHY.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. B.N. VIVEK., ADV. FOR SRI ABHINAV RAMANAND A., ADV.)
AND: M/S. DTDC COURIER & CARGO LTD., CORPORATE OFFICE, NO.269, LAHARI TOWERS, ALBERT VICTOR ROAD, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU-560 018. REP. BY ITS ASST. REGIONAL MANAGER-SCS SRI. RAVI MENZEZ.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. S RAJENDRA, ADV.)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE (1) OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.11.2014 PASSED IN OS NO.6294/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREED THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
Even after providing sufficient opportunity, the appellants have not filed paper books. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-filing of paper books.
SD/(S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
SD/(C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S. Camson Bio Technologies Ltd.
M/s. DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd.
S.G. PANDIT
C.M. POONACHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court