Regular first appeal against a decree in a title/injunction suit was withdrawn on a memo stating the dispute had been amicably settled; the Division Bench dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:44706-DB RFA No. 202 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 202 OF 2023 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS
SRI RAMAKRISHNAPPA S/O LATE KUMANNA AGED 56 YEARS R/AT SHETTERAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka
S/O LATE KUMANNA AGED 56 YEARS R/AT SHETTERAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NAGAIAH - ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT RAMANJINAMMA W/O LATE M NAGARAJU AGE 45 YEARS.
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF V. NAGANAHALLI VILLAGE R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560032.
SRI M SRINIVASA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
W/O CHIKKA NANJUNDAPPA LOTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT SAVAKANAHALLI VILLAGE BIDALURU POST, KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT SAVAKANAHALLI VILLAGE BIDALURU POST, KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110.
NC: 2024:KHC:44706-DB RFA No. 202 of 2023
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N RAMALINGA REDDY – ADVOCATE FOR C/RESPONDENTS NO.7 TO 9, 12, 29; SRI. V SRINIVAS – ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS NO.52; RESPONDENTS NO.11, 13 TO 20, 22 TO 28, 30 TO 51 – SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.09.2022 PASSED IN OS No.13/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE III-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, C/c OF II-ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI; CONSEQUENTLY DECREE THE SUIT FILED BY THE APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS IN O.S.NO.13/2010 WITH COSTS
THIS RFA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR)
This appeal is preferred by appellants challenging the judgment and decree in O.S.No.13/2010 C/W LAC.No.11/2018 dated 22.09.2022 passed by the III Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, C/C of II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli.
settlement between the parties, hence this appeal does not survive for consideration. Therefore, memo is taken on record. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
does not survive for consideration and the same stands
disposed of accordingly.
SD/-
(K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE
SD/(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
RJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Muniyamma (since dead by her LRs Sri Ramakrishnappa)
Sri Srinivas
Sri Nagaraju (since dead by his LRs) and others
M/S Jabbar Farms
K.SOMASHEKAR
RAJESH RAI K
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
