Thulasibai v. Smt K R Ranganatha Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
Regular first appeal against dismissal of a suit for partition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the required affidavit was not filed.
Regular first appeal against dismissal of a suit for partition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the required affidavit was not filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:30589 RFA No. 1648 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1648 OF 2019 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
S/O SHRIPATHI RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O KUMARANAHALLI VILLAGE DEVARAHALLI POST BHADRAVATI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 301.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S N BHAT., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R/O KUMARANAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVARAHALLI POST BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577301
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.04.2019 PASSED IN O.S.No.32/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHADRAVATHI DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
NC: 2024:KHC:30589 RFA No. 1648 of 2019
ORAL JUDGMENT
As per the order dated 12.04.2021, necessary
affidavit has not been filed.
prosecution.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
GSR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
1 provisions across 1 enactments
THULASIBAI
SMT K R RANGANATHA RAO
KOUSALYA BAI
SHARADABAI
BHAGIRATHAMMA
MANJULA BAI
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court