Review petition against a judgment and decree in R.F.A.No.981/2014 was dismissed because no counsel appeared and process fee for notice had not been paid; the petition was not adjudicated on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:30437 RP No. 21 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REVIEW PETITION NO.21 OF 2023 IN
R.F.A.NO.981/2014 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
FAHIMUNNISSA,
W/O ABDUL WAJID, SINCE DECEASED BY HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES.
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS.
ALL R/A NO.11/13, 4TH CROSS, K.V. LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560011.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI S.SHAKER SHETTY, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1(a) M.A.ROY, S/O LATE M.S.AIYAPPA, AGED 44 YEARS, R/AT 12, 3RD CROSS, LALBAGH SIDDAPURA, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 011.
…RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CPC READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN R.F.A.NO.981/2014 PASSED ON 29.11.2022 THE SAME ACCORDING TO LAW.
NC: 2024:KHC:30437 RP No. 21 of 2023
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the review petitioners. Process fee not
paid for issue of notice.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA)
JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Fahimunnissa (deceased) by legal representatives including Abdul Wajid
M.A.Vaishali (deceased) by legal representative M.A.Roy
V Srishananda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
