Miscellaneous second appeal against remand of a land acquisition compensation suit was withdrawn by the appellant via memo, as the dispute was settled through family elders; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:35880 MSA No. 124 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL No. 124 OF 2018 (RO)
BETWEEN:
SANDHYA SHIVAPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O SHIVAPRASAD, R/AT NEHRUNAGARA, KABAKA VILLAGE,. PUTTUR TLAUK, D.K.-574 201.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.ASHISH RAM D., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.KRISHNAMOORTHY D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, D/O LATE PAKEERA,
R/AT NERHRUNAGARA, KABAKA VILALGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K.574 201.
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
W/O BAPPAAYYA,
R/AT NEHRUNAGARA,KABAKA VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K-574201.
(RESPONDENT Nos.1 AND 2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1[U] OF THE CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.08.2018 PASSED IN RA.NO.41/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND A.C.J.M., PUTTUR TALUK D.K, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
NC: 2024:KHC:35880 MSA No. 124 of 2018
AND DECREE DATED 09.10.2012 PASSED IN LAC NO.68/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., PUTTU AND REMANDING THE MATTER TO TRIAL COURT WITH A DIRECTION TO RE-ADMIT THE SUIT AND DECIDE THE MATTER AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
dated 03.09.2024 for withdrawal. The memo reads as
under:
"The appellant above named may be permitted to withdraw the MSA as the dispute is settled with the intervention of the elders and wellwishers of the family. Hence the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the present MSA in the interest of justice and equity.”
as withdrawn.
Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandhya Shivaprasad
Smt. Sesamma
Smt. Minka
V SRISHANANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
