The High Court of Karnataka dismissed this miscellaneous first appeal for non-prosecution. The appellant, appearing neither physically nor via video conference, failed to comply with office objections after multiple adjournments.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution; costs are to be recovered by the Legal Services Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:4042-DB MFA No. 84 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2022 (LAC)
BETWEEN:
MAHADEVAPPA S/O LATE PUTTALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT LALITHADRIPURA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK, AND DISTRICT-570 085.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VEERABHADRA SWAMY H.P., ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MUDA MYSORE TALUK, DISTRICT-570 024.
…RESPONDENT
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.54(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 08.07.2011 PASSED IN LAC NO.132/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, MYSORE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE APPLICATION U/S.18 OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:4042-DB MFA No. 84 of 2022
O R D E R
None appears for the appellant either physically or through video conference.
of the office objections. All the while adjournment is granted but, the appellant has failed to comply the office objection till date.
NC: 2024:KHC:4042-DB MFA No. 84 of 2022
dated 17.01.2024 and today’s order to the Legal Services Committee of this Court for their needful at the earliest.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution with a direction to the Legal Services Committee of this Court as stated above.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed by the appellant under S.54(1) of Land Acquisition Act is maintainable given the appellant's non-compliance with office objections.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahadevappa S/o Late Puttalingaiah
The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Muda Mysore Taluk
H.B. Prabhakara Satry
Ramachandra D. Huddar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
